Subscribe
792 Sterling Ext Landscape

792 Sterling Place was built in 2007 and apartments are rent-stabilized. Photo: Emily Myers

Case Study

Rent-stabilized tenants fight for an energy efficient retrofit — and win

Demands for effi­ciency pay off for tenants in Brooklyn’s Crown Heights in the form of brand-new heat pumps

Published in Edition 7

For years, tenants at 792 Sterling Pl., an 82-unit rent-stabi­lized building in Brooklyn’s Crown Heights, endured freezing winters due to inad­e­quate heating. The heaters were completely useless; at times, I’d use my oven to try and heat the apart­ment,” said Chase Dimura, who rents a studio in the five-story building. Building owners Safdie Realty had installed wall-mounted elec­tric fan units that were very expen­sive to run and frequently failed to main­tain even legal indoor temper­a­tures, let alone adjust to resi­dents’ comfort. The apart­ment would be in the mid-50s Fahrenheit at times,” Dimura said.

At 792 Sterling Pl., tenants resorted to buying space heaters. The combined cost of inef­fi­cient fan heating and addi­tional elec­tric radi­a­tors pushed some resi­dents’ monthly energy bills to more than $900

792 Sterling Old Fan Heater Lobby

One of the old electric fan heaters is still installed in the lobby at 792 Sterling Place. Photo: Emily Myers

When Anna Nemetz moved into a one-bedroom at the building in early 2023, she was shocked to get an elec­tricity bill for $376. It wasn’t even the full month, and I was already feeling pres­sure finan­cially,” she said. Even though New York City land­lords are required to provide heat, in some newer build­ings like this one, which was built in 2007, payment for the utility falls on tenants. That whole first winter I felt very isolated and almost ashamed,” Nemetz said. Even though she raised issues with the building’s manage­ment, JSAF Property Management, her drafty windows and fan heaters kept her energy use high. 

The Challenge

New York apart­ments must be heated to 68°F during the day and 62°F at night during what’s called heat season” — between October 1 and May 31, when the outdoor temper­a­ture is below 55°F. If they aren’t, a land­lord can face legal action in housing court.

At 792 Sterling Pl., there’s a long history of housing court action over heat and hot water, going back to 2011Housing Preservation and Development (HPD), which over­sees building condi­tions, has initi­ated multiple cases over the years in response to unre­solved heat and hot water viola­tions. In general, fines for a lack of heat start at $350, and can quickly reach $1,500 per day for repeated offenses. By the middle of 2024, the building had so many viola­tions and heat complaints that it was enrolled in a HPD heat sensor program to closely monitor condi­tions. In the past two years, liti­ga­tion against the building’s land­lord has resulted in fines of $68,550 for a lack of heat and hot water.

In addi­tion to base­line heating require­ments, many land­lords city­wide are consid­ering elec­tric alter­na­tives to oil and natural gas in an effort to meet carbon emis­sion caps and avoid fines under Local Law 97 (LL97). Buildings with more than 35 percent rent-stabi­lized units, like 792 Sterling Pl., have some flex­i­bility in meeting LL97’s carbon emis­sion targets, but must still imple­ment energy conser­va­tion measures. However, since the heating system at this Crown Heights rental is elec­tric, the land­lord is tech­ni­cally already in compli­ance with the law — without a gas or oil-fired boiler, the building is consid­ered emis­sion-free. Even though the existing heat system is inef­fi­cient, the land­lord is not facing LL97 penalties.

According to city data, a 10-percent reduc­tion in elec­tricity use at the building would generate $10,333 in savings. Yet these savings wouldn’t benefit the land­lord — rather, they would help out the indi­vidual tenants who pay the utility bills. So, with little incen­tive for manage­ment to upgrade to a better system, how could tenants get their land­lord to fix their inef­fi­cient, inef­fec­tive, and expen­sive heating? 

The Roadmap

Collective action has long been a strategy for rent-stabi­lized tenants to get land­lords to meet their oblig­a­tions. In March 2023, tenants at 792 Sterling Pl. began talking to each other about condi­tions in their apart­ments. Nemetz helped migrate a largely inac­tive Facebook group to Whatsapp, and encour­aged resi­dents to join. The group ulti­mately attracted over seventy tenants. It was building soli­darity, building commu­nity, and the purpose was to talk about issues in the building, the main one being a lack of legal heat,” Nemetz said. 

From her window on the third floor, Nemetz could see HVAC equip­ment on the roofs of neigh­boring build­ings — condensers for a heat pump system. Nemetz wondered if this could be an alter­na­tive heating solu­tion to present to the land­lord. After some research, the newly re-formed tenant group concluded duct­less mini split heat pumps were the answer to their heat problem. A lot of us had been in other apart­ments where we had these split units and it was fine,” Nemetz said. It’s a little bit expen­sive, but nowhere near what people were paying [at 792 Sterling Pl.].”

As temper­a­tures dropped again in late 2023, land­lord inac­tion over the heat pushed the tenant orga­nizers to esca­late their efforts. They held a building-wide call-in day to 311, the city’s complaints hotline. Calls to 311 can lead to building viola­tions, adding to fines for the land­lord. Over the past two years 198 complaints have been made about the building; 132 are related to a lack of heat. The tenants also contacted their City Council and state repre­sen­ta­tives. They sought advice from non-profit legal clinics, getting tips on nego­ti­ating with the land­lord and infor­ma­tion about their rights. 

In the right circum­stances and with the right prepa­ra­tion, with­holding rent can be used as a tactic to get a land­lord to make repairs. Having spelled out the heat prob­lems to the land­lord, via HPD and in written commu­ni­ca­tions, this was the tenants’ next move. At least a dozen resi­dents with­held a portion of their rent, between $500 to $700 for each apart­ment,” Nemetz said. In most cases this was the cost of their monthly heating bills. The deci­sion to go on partial rent strike wasn’t taken lightly. It’s very scary to with­hold rent. People were really afraid, myself included,” Nemetz added. 

Withholding rent raises the risk of a land­lord filing an evic­tion case in housing court for non-payment. If a tenant is sued for with­holding rent, they may raise the lack of services as a defense in the proceeding and seek an abate­ment from the court,” said Magda Rosa-Rios, director of housing group advo­cacy at The Legal Aid Society. A rent abate­ment can either be nego­ti­ated with the land­lord or may be ordered by a court. But for tenants, the prospect of liti­ga­tion can be daunting; it’s often an unmatched fight, even if your case is strong. 

The land­lord and building manage­ment acknowl­edged the tenant’s concerns, but it didn’t result in any mean­ingful changes. (Neither party responded to multiple requests for comment for this article.) From the tenants’ perspec­tive, collec­tive action got results. Within six weeks of the partial rent strike, the prop­erty manager agreed to a meeting where resi­dents again asked for heat pumps to replace the fan heaters. Management used the meeting to push for an end to the rent strike, but Nemetz said this was some­thing their group would not commit to without a time­line for upgrades. Soon enough, heat season was over, and there was still no lasting or building-wide solution.

Even so, as winter rolled around again in 2024, tenant organ­isers were hopeful. The only time we ever heard a whisper of a plan was when we with­held rent,” Nemetz said, so they decided to commit to it again. This time the 15 or so tenants involved in the rent strike with­held their full rent. Within a few months they achieved a major victory. JSAF Management was replaced by Elite Management, and by early January 2025, plans had been filed with the Department of Buildings to replace the expen­sive fan heaters with high-effi­ciency heat pumps to provide both heating and cooling. 

The Project

The heat pump instal­la­tion began by late January. It was amazing how quickly they jumped into action,” Nemetz said. Even so, the rollout was far from smooth. One of the chal­lenges with mini split units is the need to run refrig­erant lines throughout the building to connect to rooftop condensers. This added to the disrup­tion for resi­dents, who had to provide workers access to their apart­ments. It was super inva­sive,” Nemetz said. Tarps were needed to protect personal belong­ings. The drilling was noisy. There were holes in the walls. The work created dust that wasn’t always cleaned up. Yet after what Dimura called a grueling” few weeks, the instal­la­tion was complete and the units were functional. 

Nemetz was charged $144 for elec­tricity the following month. I was hoping it would be lower, but I feel great about it,” she said. Other tenants saw a decrease of up to 60 percent in their utility bills. The mini splits deliver both heating and cooling, and since heat pumps are gener­ally more effi­cient than window AC units, the tenants are hopeful elec­tricity costs will decrease year-round. The cost of elec­tricity is instantly less,” Dimura said.

792 Sterling Wall Unit Interior

The newly installed mini split units use heat pump technology, which is estimated to be 75 percent more efficient than electric fan heaters. Photo: Emily Myers

According to city data, the esti­mated cost of installing the mini splits at 792 Sterling Pl. was $406,500, trans­lating to roughly $4950 per unit. Incentives are avail­able for these types of projects, and it’s likely the land­lord took advan­tage of finan­cial help provided by Con Edison’s Multifamily Clean Heat program. Buildings using gas, oil, or non-heat pump elec­tric heating are all eligible,” said Elisabeth Ferrari, media rela­tions manager at Con Edison, adding that LL97 impli­ca­tions are not a factor in the eligi­bility screening for finan­cial incentives.

Although the effi­ciency savings will be enjoyed by the tenants, there are bene­fits for the land­lord as well. At the very least, costly fines and rent strikes for lack of heat should now be elim­i­nated. The land­lord hasn’t shared the precise reason behind the deci­sion to install heat pumps; It may have been the coor­di­nated tenant action, a persua­sive new prop­erty manage­ment company wanting to end rent strikes, finan­cial incen­tives bringing down the cost of heat pump instal­la­tions, or even just common sense around energy effi­ciency. Perhaps it was all of these. In any case, Nemetz is glad for the change, and is looking forward to warmer winters. 

Emily Myers is an award-winning free­lance writer and audio producer based in New York.