Subscribe
The madison elevator horizontal

Financing

“A nice long runway”

An energy audit sets a ten-year path for compli­ance and savings at a Jackson Heights co-op

Published in Edition 9

The Madison’s elevator controller. Photo: Sunny Nagpaul

As any New York home­owner can attest, over­hauling any major building system is sure to be expen­sive. And co-op share­holders at the Madison, like many other co-ops around the city, are sharply atten­tive to managing costs. That’s why, when the building’s board lead­er­ship decided to invest in energy effi­cient upgrades, they cared about more than just complying with the city’s local energy laws — they wanted to shore up the phys­ical and finan­cial future of their home and asset, along with getting good value. But to do any signif­i­cant upgrades, the building needed a plan.

The Jackson Heights co-op was built in the late 1930s, and with the help of the building’s manage­ment company under­went a number of small-to-moderate effi­ciency upgrades over the past several years, mostly driven by a desire to save money and modernize the building. But the looming carbon emis­sion stan­dards laid out by Local Law 97 (LL97) have forced the building’s board to think about upgrades on a different time scale. It’s likely they’ll have to take on projects over the next several decades, so board pres­i­dent Michael Parrella has been working to create a culture where share­holders are proac­tively managing our building and looking ahead, rather than waiting for the next thing to break and then respond to that.” 

As a housing coop­er­a­tive, board members and share­holders need to reach agree­ments on finances before making big capital invest­ments. Uniting the share­holders, Parrella said, requires lots of educa­tion” on how much energy effi­ciency projects cost, antic­i­pated cost-savings, and why they are needed. So in the late summer of 2023, he hired Bright Power, an energy solu­tions provider, to run an energy audit to analyze their building, assessing its energy systems like the boiler and hot water heaters, windows and poten­tial draft spots, and lighting. 

It was a way to under­stand the building’s starting point, and offered a view towards the future: Hard figures to describe future changes needed to avoid LL97 fines, and the finan­cial savings those invest­ments could bring. But the biggest benefit the audit offered was time: It revealed that the Madison would be free of fines from the local law until 2035, giving them a nice, long runway” to plan for larger capital improve­ments, according to Parrella. 

The Bright Power audit recom­mended that the Madison replace its windows for better insu­la­tion, and even­tu­ally replace its boiler — projects that are likely to cost a few million dollars over several years. The board plans to take advan­tage of the long runway by launching an educa­tion campaign for share­holders, to explain the need to fund and finance more effi­cient tech­nology projects. 

To the central ques­tion of how to raise large sums of capital, no firm deci­sions have been made yet. We’ve laid out a couple of ideas for share­holders, and the numbers are signif­i­cant,” Parrella said. Among the tools at their disposal are levying assess­ments to build up their capital reserve, and refi­nancing the mort­gage to access more credit. They’re also looking into the various state and federal tax credits avail­able for clean energy projects that could offset money share­holders spend in increased assessments.

One compli­cating factor, however, is that the multi-year time­line for large-scale retro­fits described by the audit is much longer than the tenure of the board, which is re-elected every year.

Still, the ten-year runway before the building must comply with LL97 is a big help when it comes to plan­ning the money element of these expen­sive improve­ments — it affords the coop­er­a­tive the time to map out the big changes they’ll need to make to finance these projects. This year, the board has begun devel­oping time­lines to complete the antic­i­pated window and boiler projects that are likely to extend well into the future. 

[Local Law 97] is unlike any other in that it has such a long time frame. Most folks don’t plan their lives in that type of time frame. So this law really encour­ages co-ops to be a bit more proac­tive,” said Parrella. “[The law] was passed six years ago, but most co-ops have not made plans for it. Why? The dead­lines are far enough out that I think they think it’s not a big deal, but even­tu­ally it’s going to start to hit people.”

Sunny Nagpaul is a reporter based in New York City, covering climate, science, poli­tics, and business.