Subscribe
HRH courtyard 2

Financing

How nonprofit developers financed Harlem River Houses’ major rehabilitation

To complete the multi-million-dollar retrofit, part­ners on the project lever­aged a mix of public and private funding sources

Published in Edition 11

Harlem River Houses underwent many renovations, including new windows. But its historical designation meant that its façades were required to remain intact. Photo: Camille Squires

Harlem River Houses’ histor­ical land­mark desig­na­tion as a shining example of New Deal progres­sivism is gener­ally a point of pride for its resi­dents, manage­ment, and devel­opers. But when it came to plan­ning — and paying for — a clean energy upgrade, that land­mark status also posed a challenge. 

I would say the real chal­lenging part was balancing the scope and different scope prior­i­ties with the avail­able funding,” said Eliot Hetterley, a senior project manager at Settlement Housing Fund, the nonprofit devel­oper that co-led reha­bil­i­ta­tion on the HRH complex. 

In order to retrofit the prop­erty in 2022, the owners figured out a way to turn the unique chal­lenges of the Harlem River Houses into unique financing advantages. 

They found a way to make financing the HRH reno­va­tion more afford­able through the Permanent Affordability Coming Together (PACT) program. The city first created the initia­tive in 2016 as a way to bring private and non-profit dollars into public housing explic­itly for reno­va­tions. Under the program, resi­dences are converted from Section 9 housing, which is totally owned and oper­ated by NYCHA, to project-based Section 8 housing, which opens up oppor­tu­ni­ties for private devel­op­ment and funding, while also protecting tenants’ rights to remain in rent-assisted housing. The program has not been without its contro­ver­sies, but has still taken off. Today, it covers roughly a quarter of NYCHA’s port­folio, with roughly 30 PACT-paid projects underway across the city. 

At HRH, a team of devel­op­ment part­ners were selected through the PACT program to lead the public housing property’s reno­va­tions, including modern­izing the outdated steam heating systems, updating the property’s windows to be better insu­lated, and substi­tuting LED lighting across multiple build­ings. The HRH complex’s phys­ical upgrades took several years to complete and cost $275 million in total. 

Doing these retrofit projects under the PACT program allowed devel­opers to use a mix of public and private funding to complete the public housing site’s upgrades. We pulled together a lot of different sources with the help of a lot of very crit­ical part­ners, espe­cially NYCHA and HDC [the city’s Housing Development Corporation],” said Hetterly. Both NYCHA and HDC provided subsidy loans for the project’s completion. 

Additionally, one of the most signif­i­cant financing sources for the project was a historic tax credit equity that devel­op­ment part­ners secured from JP Morgan Chase as a private bank investor. The older 1930s portion of the HRH complex, made up of a seven-building enclave that now has the land­mark site desig­na­tion, gave it access to this historic tax credit, which covered roughly $63 million — or about 23 percent of the project’s total cost.

New York’s historic reha­bil­i­ta­tion tax credit program has been lever­aged by devel­opers and land­lords to revi­talize hundreds of prop­er­ties across the state, including public housing sites. Since 2022, an esti­mated 106 afford­able housing projects have used New York’s historic tax credit program to create 1,757 new units and reha­bil­i­tate 2,412 existing units. Although a rigorous review process by federal and state author­i­ties is involved as part of the process to secure the historic tax credit, many NYCHA-owned housing prop­er­ties reha­bil­i­tated through the PACT program have been able to success­fully secure the preser­va­tion-based tax credits, according to Hetterley. 

Yet securing financing was only half of the battle. Once the diver­si­fied pool of resources was secured, the next chal­lenge was to stretch those funds to cover the reha­bil­i­ta­tion project’s ambi­tious goals.

Reporting contributed by John Surico.

Natasha Ishak is a free­lance jour­nalist covering poli­tics, public policy, and social justice issues.